Mastering Mutual Funds: How Scheme Benchmarks Impact Your Returns
Mutual fund schemes are designed to invest in the market for the benefit of unit-holders. But how can we truly gauge the performance of a scheme?
A mutual fund benchmark is a standard index against which a mutual fund’s performance is measured. It reflects the performance of a relevant market segment and helps investors gauge how well their fund is performing compared to the broader market or specific sector
What makes a benchmark credible? First and foremost, it should align with the scheme’s investment objective. The securities or variables used in the benchmark calculation must accurately reflect the type of portfolio the scheme intends to build.
It should also be consistent with the scheme’s asset allocation pattern and investment strategy. As Warren Buffett wisely noted,
“Risk comes from not knowing what you’re doing”
A well-chosen benchmark provides clarity, helping to assess the scheme’s performance effectively.
A credible benchmark is also one that’s calculated by an independent agency, ensuring transparency and regular updates. Typically, benchmarks are constructed by entities like stock exchanges, credit rating agencies, securities research firms, or financial publications.
For index funds, selecting a benchmark is straightforward; the scheme’s objective is to track a specific index, making that index the natural choice as its benchmark. But what about other types of schemes? Here, the process is more subjective.
The Asset Management Company (AMC), in consultation with the trustees, determines the appropriate benchmark. This benchmark is then specified in the Scheme Information Document (SID), ensuring that both the scheme’s performance and the benchmark’s performance are presented side by side.
Can a benchmark change over time? Yes, it can. The need to update a benchmark may arise for various reasons; perhaps the investment objective of the scheme has evolved, the index has been restructured, or a more suitable index has become available.
In such cases, the AMC may opt to change the benchmark after consulting with the trustees, provided that the change is well-justified and documented.
Mutual fund schemes are required to disclose the benchmark index or indices against which the scheme’s performance is compared. This transparency helps investors make informed decisions by understanding how their investments are performing relative to the market.
Benchmarks are crucial because they provide a point of reference to assess the performance of a mutual fund. They help investors understand whether a fund is meeting its investment objectives and if the fund manager is adding value beyond the market average.
In the past, mutual fund schemes were benchmarked against the Price Return Index (PRI), which only captured capital gains. But was this enough to truly assess performance? PRI overlooks a key component of dividends.
To address this, SEBI introduced a significant change on February 1, 2018: mutual funds are now benchmarked against the Total Return Index (TRI). But why was this shift necessary?
TRI offers a more comprehensive measure of performance by including not just capital gains but also dividends and interest payments from the index constituents. This adjustment ensures a fairer and more accurate comparison.
By factoring in dividends, TRI provides a clearer reflection of the true returns generated by a mutual fund scheme.
Consider this: if a scheme’s performance, including dividends, were compared to a benchmark like PRI that excludes them, it would create an artificial advantage. The shift to TRI addresses this issue, marking a step toward greater transparency in the mutual fund industry.
Does this mean that fewer schemes will appear to outperform their benchmarks? Yes, but not because their performance has declined; rather, the comparison is now more accurate. The difference between PRI and TRI returns is essentially the dividend yield, which has historically ranged between 1.5% to 2.5% in the Indian market.
This move to TRI represents a more accurate and transparent way of assessing mutual fund performance, aligning the benchmarks with the true returns that investors should consider.
When selecting a benchmark for performance comparison, what should be your main considerations? SEBI provides clarity on this in their January 4, 2018 circular. But how do you ensure that the benchmark truly reflects the scheme’s intent?
The benchmark must be chosen based on three key factors:
These elements, all detailed in the Scheme Information Document, guide you in selecting a benchmark that genuinely mirrors the scheme’s goals and strategy, ensuring a fair and accurate performance comparison.
How can mutual fund benchmarks be made more consistent and transparent? SEBI’s October 27, 2021, circular introduced a two-tiered benchmarking system to address this need.
By adopting this two-tiered approach, SEBI aims to provide a more nuanced performance evaluation. Additionally, all benchmarks will now use Total Return Indices, which include both capital gains and dividends. This change ensures that investors get a more comprehensive and accurate picture of how their schemes are performing.
How do you truly measure mutual fund performance? By using relevant benchmarks, as mandated by SEBI. Ensure your benchmarks:
These steps provide a clearer view of your fund’s performance, helping you make more informed investment choices.
Listen to this article Power looks dominant—until it fails. History is rarely decided by who…
Listen to this article Is building a retirement corpus of ₹1–2 crore really only possible…
Listen to this article Markets feel predictable—until they suddenly aren’t. At market peaks, confidence is…
Listen to this article Your salary will likely grow with time. Promotions, job switches, and…
Listen to this article Markets are falling, headlines are screaming, and uncertainty feels louder than…
Listen to this article What if the biggest mistake in your investing journey isn’t choosing…